Premium Pools · Plant Room Installation
Technical Reference · Interactive Charts

Four Calculators.
One Set of Constraints.

Filter area, media performance, pump duty and heating load are not four separate decisions — each one narrows the next. These are the working charts we size against, with every assumption stated on the page rather than buried in a spreadsheet.

Every chart on this page is live. Enter your own figures and the curves redraw against them. Nothing here is a rule of thumb — each curve is drawn from a stated formula or a published dataset, and where a figure is estimated rather than measured, the chart says so on its face.

01 — Filtration Sizing

Filtration Area Selector

Enter the pool volume and the turnover you are designing to. That fixes the circulation flow, and everything after it is a trade: less filter area means higher velocity through the media, and higher velocity means the water leaves the filter dirtier. Move along the curve to see where a given area lands you.

Circulation flow150.0 m³/hr
hr
Filter media
Published turnover periods by pool type
Pool type PWTAG (UK) MAHC (US CDC)
Competition pool, 50 m3–4 h6 h max
Public / hotel pool up to 25 m2.5–3 h6 h max
Leisure water over 1.5 m deep2–2.5 h6 h max
Leisure water 1–1.5 m deep1–2 h2 h max
Teaching / learner / training pool30–90 min
Hydrotherapy pool30–90 min
Children’s water 0.5–1 m deep30–75 min1 h max
Children’s water up to 0.5 m deep10–45 min1 h max
Domestic / private pool4–8 hnot covered
Diving pool4–8 h8 h max
Spa — commercial6 min30 min max
Spa — domestic15 minnot covered
Interactive water feature20 min30 min max

PWTAG figures are Table 2 of the Code of Practice for the Management and Treatment of Swimming Pool Water, August 2019. MAHC figures are the maximum turnover times in the CDC Model Aquatic Health Code. PWTAG states a range to design within; MAHC states a ceiling not to exceed. Neither is enforceable in India, and where the two disagree the shorter figure is the safer basis for sizing.

Filtration velocity
Filter area required
Removal efficiency
Clarity band
Move along the curve to read filter area against velocity. Click to lock a point and size the vessels below.
Excellent · 95%+ Good · 88–95% Marginal · 75–88% Poor · 55–75% Failing · below 55%

Filtration area (m²) against filtration velocity (m³/hr/m²), coloured by the removal efficiency the selected media achieves at that velocity.

Vessel diameterArea eachVessels needed Installed areaActual velocity Removal efficiencyClarity band

Standard pressure filter diameters, and how many of each it takes to reach the area at the cursor. Because vessels come in whole numbers, the velocity a pool actually runs at is rarely the one it was sized for — the last three columns are the real figures.

How the curve is built. Circulation flow is volume divided by turnover. Filtration velocity is that flow divided by filter surface area, so for any fixed flow the area required is simply flow ÷ velocity — the hyperbola on the chart. The colour along it is the particulate removal efficiency for the selected media at that velocity, interpolated from the same dataset that drives chart 02 below.
Area is only one of three variables. This chart holds media bed depth and hydraulic balance constant. A correctly sized filter running at 15 m³/hr/m² on a 600 mm bed will not hold particulate the way the same velocity does on a 1200 mm bed. Read the area here as a floor, not a specification.
02 — Media Performance

Removal Efficiency vs. Velocity

The dataset behind the colour on chart 01, shown directly. Particulate removal efficiency falls as filtration velocity rises, and glass media stays ahead of silica sand at every velocity band — but the gap only becomes decisive once the medium-rate threshold is crossed.

Particulate removal efficiency vs. filtration velocity — glass media vs. silica sand. Hover over the chart for exact readings.

Sand-curve shape and the 25 m/h threshold reflect PWTAG's published filtration rate guidance (low-rate ≤10 m/h, medium-rate 10–25 m/h, high-rate 25–50 m/h; high-rate ≈10–25% as effective as medium-rate). Source: pwtag.org. Glass-media curve reflects directional industry consensus on finer particle capture, not a single controlled study.

Why this matters more than filter count. Clarity is decided by surface area, media depth and velocity — not by how many vessels are installed. Six small filters can carry less area than two large ones, and run faster on a shallower bed while doing it. The worked example is on the Water Clarity page.
03 — Equipment Sizing

Pump Sizing at Real Head

Every rated flow figure in every catalogue is quoted at a reference head of around 8 m. Almost no pool runs at 8 m. Fix the head your system actually imposes, then read across: the curve is the horsepower needed to deliver each discharge at that head. This is why pump counts derived from rated flow under-deliver once installed.

m
Reference points
Discharge (cursor)
Horsepower required
Tier to specify
Move the cursor across the chart to read horsepower against discharge at the head entered above.

Pump rating (HP) against discharge (m³/hr) at the selected head. Faint grey curves are the same relationship at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 m for comparison.

Pump tierDischarge at this head Shut-off headRated pointData confidence

These are the points the curve is drawn through. A tier past its shut-off head delivers nothing and drops out of the curve entirely.

How the curve is built. Each pump tier has a fitted head–flow characteristic of the form H = H₀ − kQ², derived from manufacturer-published rated points at the catalogue reference head together with published shut-off head. For the head entered above, the discharge of every tier is solved and plotted against its horsepower; the curve joins those points. The 5 HP tier is published as a 60 Hz unit and has been converted to 50 Hz by the affinity laws (Q × 0.833, H × 0.694) — India runs at 50 Hz, so its real output here sits below the catalogue figure.
The 7.5 and 10 HP tiers are extrapolated. No published curve data was available for these ratings, so their points are projected from the trend of the measured tiers and are drawn hollow with a dashed curve. Indicative only — treat them as a shape, not a specification, and confirm against an actual curve sheet before selecting equipment at these ratings.
Readings are taken off printed curve sheets. Where a tier is marked chart read rather than measured, the figures are visual estimates from a published graph, not tabulated manufacturer data. Adequate for comparing tiers and understanding the shape of the problem; not adequate as the sole basis for final equipment selection on a large project.
04 — Equipment Sizing

Heat Pump Capacity vs. ΔT

A pool's heat-up load is fixed by water volume and temperature rise, not by a rule of thumb. Enter the volume and the heat-up window, then read the required capacity at your ΔT. A 3°C-ambient equipment derating and a covered-outdoor-pool heat-loss buffer are already built in, so the number read off the curve is the nameplate rating to specify.

hr
Heat-Up Time (as entered above) Heat Pump Capacity Needed

ΔT (°C) vs. required heat pump rated capacity (kW). Hover or tap to read the exact capacity at any ΔT.

Derating is not flat across this curve. It is coupled to ΔT itself. Large ΔT is paired with a milder, early-winter ambient assumption (30% capacity loss); small ΔT is paired with the coldest, peak-winter design point (50% capacity loss). No single day sees both the season's worst derating and its largest ΔT at once. The full basis, and why a heat pump is a maintenance device rather than a rapid heat-up device, is set out on the Heat Pump Sizing page.

These charts describe constraints, not quotations. Bed depth, hydraulic balance, pipe sizing and plant room layout all sit behind them, and a number that reads acceptable here can still be wrong on a specific site. If you are working on a scheme and want the figures checked against the actual drawings, we will do that.

Request a Conversation